LSAT Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare effectively for the LSAT Test. Utilize flashcards and tackle multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Ace your test with confidence!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

What does "Incapable" signify in formal logic?

Evidence
Necessity
Mutually Exclusive
Conclusion

The correct answer is: Mutually Exclusive

"Incapable" in formal logic signifies that two things are mutually exclusive. This means that the occurrence of one thing excludes the possibility of the other. This term is used to indicate that two events or conditions cannot happen at the same time or coexist. In the context of logical reasoning, understanding the concept of mutual exclusivity is important in making accurate deductions and drawing valid conclusions based on the given information. The other options are not correct because: A. Evidence - "Incapable" does not directly signify evidence in formal logic. B. Necessity - "Incapable" does not indicate necessity in formal logic. D. Conclusion - While "Incapable" can lead to a conclusion in logical reasoning, it specifically refers to the mutual exclusivity of two possibilities.