LSAT Practice Test

What is the logical construct of a Descriptive Conclusion in LSAT terms?

1. Two types of Conclusions

2. In a Comparison, the author makes a claim about one thing in relation to another thing.

3. are always situations in which it is healthy to try to express one's anger.

4. Assertions of Truth

The correct answer is: are always situations in which it is healthy to try to express one's anger.

In LSAT terms, a Descriptive Conclusion refers to a type of conclusion that describes a particular situation or state of affairs without offering an evaluation or judgment. This type of conclusion aims to provide an accurate depiction or portrayal of a scenario without implying whether it is positive or negative. Option C, "are always situations in which it is healthy to try to express one's anger," correctly captures the essence of a Descriptive Conclusion. This statement simply describes a situation where expressing anger could be seen as healthy without making a judgment about whether it is always the case or whether it is the best course of action. The other options are not related to the logical construct of a Descriptive Conclusion: - Option A talks about the types of conclusions in general and does not specifically address Descriptive Conclusions. - Option B discusses comparisons, which are not directly related to Descriptive Conclusions. - Option D mentions assertions of truth, which is a broader concept and not specific to the nature of Descriptive Conclusions. Therefore, option C is the correct choice as it accurately represents the logical construct of a Descriptive Conclusion in LSAT terms.