LSAT Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare effectively for the LSAT Test. Utilize flashcards and tackle multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Ace your test with confidence!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

Which conclusion can be drawn from the statement "Raimundo appears in every photograph that Yakira does not appear in"?

Not Y implies R
Not R implies Y
R implies not Y
Y implies not R

The correct answer is: Not Y implies R

The correct conclusion that can be drawn from the statement "Raimundo appears in every photograph that Yakira does not appear in" is "Not Y implies R" (Choice A). This means that if Yakira does not appear in a photograph, then Raimundo will definitely appear in that same photograph. This conclusion logically follows from the given statement because Raimundo only appears in photographs where Yakira is not present. This relationship is accurately captured by Choice A. Choices B, C, and D do not accurately reflect the relationship described in the statement. Choice B states "Not R implies Y," which is the opposite of the correct conclusion. Choices C and D, "R implies not Y" and "Y implies not R" respectively, do not align with the original statement that specifies Raimundo appears in photographs where Yakira is not present. Therefore, they are not the correct conclusions to draw from the given statement.